Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Industrial Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanojevi\#263;, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Workers’ Power in Transition Economies: the Cases of Serbia and Slovenia

Miroslav Stanojevi\#263;

Univerza v Ljubljani, SLOVENIAmiroslav.stanojevic{at}Uni-Lj.si

The root of the differences between the successful transition inSlovenia and the abortive transition in Serbia, the impetus for the divorce between Serbia and Slovenia which was the starting point of the disintegration of the former Yugoslav federation, lay in the qualitatively different reactions ofthe Serbian and Slovenian political elites to the workers’ strike movements of the second half of the 1980s and the early 1990s. In Serbia, the political faction which rejected market reform was the political victor. This faction used nationalism as an instrument for aggressive labour pacification. In Slovenia, the option of gradual market reforms won out. This option offered a ‘voice’ to the labour movement.

European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 9, No. 3, 283-301 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/09596801030093003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of Industrial RelationsHome page
M. Grdesic
Mapping the Paths of the Yugoslav Model: Labour Strength and Weakness in Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia
European Journal of Industrial Relations, June 1, 2008; 14(2): 133 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
G. Hollinshead and M. Maclean
Transition and organizational dissonance in Serbia
Human Relations, October 1, 2007; 60(10): 1551 - 1574.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Labor Studies JournalHome page
P. Singh, T. J. Bartkiw, and Z. Suster
The Yugoslav Experience with Workers' Councils: A Reexamination
Labor Studies Journal, September 1, 2007; 32(3): 280 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Comparative Political StudiesHome page
M. Feldmann
Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries: Industrial Relations and Wage Bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia
Comparative Political Studies, September 1, 2006; 39(7): 829 - 854.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of Industrial RelationsHome page
C. Welz and T. Kauppinen
Industrial Action and Conflict Resolution in the New Member States
European Journal of Industrial Relations, March 1, 2005; 11(1): 91 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JIRHome page
R. V. Aguilera and A. Dabu
Transformation of Employment Relations Systems in Central and Eastern Europe
Journal of Industrial Relations, March 1, 2005; 47(1): 16 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]